Max Group Corporation v. Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation et al
| Max Group Corporation |
| Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, Orient Overseas Container Line Limited, a foreign corporation, Orient Overseas Container Line Limited and OOCL |
| 2:2022cv02295 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #17 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (rolm)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Orient Overseas Container Line Limited answer now due 6/30/2022, re Amended Complaint/Petition, #13 filed by Defendant Orient Overseas Container Line Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Qian Shen added to party Orient Overseas Container Line Limited(pty:dft))(Shen, Qian) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/23/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 7/7/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation, (Cicala, Conte) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #13 filed by Defendant Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation.(Attorney Conte C Cicala added to party Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation(pty:dft))(Cicala, Conte) |
| Filing 13 First Amended Complaint for Damages AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 , filed by MAX GROUP CORPORATION Max Group Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bill of Ladings for Yang Ming, #2 Exhibit Bill of Ladings for OOCL)(Lin, Vincent) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Max Group Corporation, upon Defendant Orient Overseas Container Line Limited served on 4/12/2022, answer due 6/13/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Lin, Vincent) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by MAX GROUP CORPORATION Max Group Corporation, identifying MAX GROUP CORPORATION. (Lin, Vincent) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($403 paid on 04/06/2022, receipt number 33080084), filed by MAX GROUP CORPORATION Max Group Corporation.(Lin, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Orient Overseas Container Line Limited, Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation. (car) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by MAX GROUP CORPORATION Max Group Corporation. (Lin, Vincent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33080084 - Fee: $402, filed by MAX GROUP CORPORATION Max Group Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bill of Ladings for Yang Ming, #2 Exhibit Bill of Ladings for OOCL) (Attorney Vincent Y Lin added to party Max Group Corporation(pty:pla))(Lin, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
