Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Federal Insurance Company et al v. Terra Worldwide Logistics LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02374
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
Terra Worldwide Logistics LLC, HMM Co., Ltd., Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation v. M/V One Apus et al
as 1:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Defendant:
M/V One Apus, in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1291 Maritime
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Cohesion Freight (HK) Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Cross Claimant:
Cohesion Freight (HK) Limited
Cross Defendant:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Newline Syndicate 1218 At Lloyd's v. Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
as 1:2022cv10905
Plaintiff:
NEWLINE SYNDICATE 1218 AT LLOYD'S Acting through its Managing Agent, Newline Underwrtiting Management Limited and Newline Syndicate 1218 At Lloyd's
Defendant:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd. et al v. Shenzhen Eva Mould Manufacturing Company Limited et al
as 1:2022cv08115
Plaintiff:
UPS Asia Group Pte. Ltd., UPS Ocean Freight Services, Inc. and UPS SCS (China) Ltd.
Defendant:
Shenzhen Eva Mould Manufacturing Company Limited, The Chamberlain Group Limited, Freig Carillo Forwarding and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07943
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., AIT Worldwide Logistics, Inc. and C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
4Th Party Defendant:
M/V One Apus, in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. and Hapag Lloyd Aktiengesellchaft, Hamburg
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation v. Globerunners Incorporated
as 1:2022cv06777
Plaintiff:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Defendant:
Globerunners Incorporated and Globerunners Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
Backer EHP Inc. et al v. M/V One Apus et al
as 1:2022cv06461
Plaintiff:
Backer EHP Inc. and HDI Global Insurance Company
Defendant:
M/V ONE Apus, Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1701 Violation of Shipping Act of 1984 (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. American Commercial Transport, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06386
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
American Commercial Transport, Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd. and Pronto Great China Corp
Defendant:
Rohlig USA LLC, Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc., Translink Shipping Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Hyundai Merchant Marine CO Ltd
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Shine Shipping Ltd, Shine International Transportation (Hong Kong) Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Yang Ming America Corporation v. Freight Express Shipping Corporation Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Yang Ming (America) Corporation, as General Agent for Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation and Yang Ming America Corporation
Defendant:
Freight Express Shipping Corporation Co., Ltd. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
