Alex Alfonso Salaverria v. State of California et al
| Alex Alfonso Salaverria |
| State of California, Gavin Newsom, Eric Garcetti, George Gascon, Chief Michael Moore, LA Homeland Security Team, Sheriff Alex Villanueva, Captain James Trateau, Doe Involved Investigators and Doe Officers Involved |
| 2:2022cv03282 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Mail Returned addressed to Alex Alfonso Salaverria re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges (CV-18) #3 . (gk) |
| Filing 12 Mail Returned addressed to Alex Alfonso Salaverria re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge #5 . (gk) |
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 22-55559 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #10 as to Plaintiff Alex Alfonso Salaverria. (gk) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL to Reinstate Complaint and Leave to Amend and Proceed In Forma Pauperis, to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Alex Alfonso Salaverria. Appeal of Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #9 Filed On: 5/19/22; Entered On: 5/23/22. (mat) |
Filing 9
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Denying #6 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Reasons: District Court lacks jurisdiction. Legally and/or factually patently frivolous. The complaint is indecipherable, and the Court is unable to determine what claims Plaintiff is alleging. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6, Case Terminated. ) (gk)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, the IFP was not attached to the initial docket entry. Please see the correction at Docket Entry No. 6. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Introduce Evidence for Litigation filed by Plaintiff Alex Alfonso Salaverria. (gk) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Alex Alfonso Salaverria. (jtil) Modified on 5/18/2022 (jtil). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alex Alfonso Salaverria. (jtil) Modified on 5/18/2022 (jtil). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Alex Alfonso Salaverria against Defendants Eric Garcetti, George Gascon, LA Homeland Security Team, Michael Moore, Gavin Newsom, State of California, James Trateau, Alex Villanueva, Doe Involved Investigators, Doe Officers Involved. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 CV71) (jtil) Modified on 5/18/2022 (jtil). |
| REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Alex Alfonso Salaverria. (jtil) . Modified on 5/18/2022 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
