Peter J. Reed v. C. Muhammed et al
| Peter J. Reed |
| C. Muhammed, Ramos, III, D. Rouse, J. Gagliardini, J. Landwehr, J. Beard and Does 1-3 |
| 2:2022cv05227 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (sh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Peter J. Reed. (sh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Peter J. Reed, (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants J. Beard, Does, J. Gagliardini, J. Landwehr, C. Muhammed, Ramos, III, D. Rouse.Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Peter J. Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 J. Landwehr, #3 J. Gagliardini, #4 D. Rouse, #5 Ramos III, #6 C. Muhammed) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
