Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Rouse v. Humana Benefit Plan of Illinois, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05224
Plaintiff:
Delilah D. Rouse
Defendant:
Humana Benefit Plan of Illinois, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Saul Miranda Ramirez v. Danial Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv07576
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Warden Danial Samuel, Associate Warden B.D. Phillips, Correctional Officer C. Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Reed v. C. Muhammed, et al
as 23-55764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER J. REED
Defendant / Appellee:
C. MUHAMMED, RAMOS III, D. ROUSE and others
Maurice Miles, Sr. v. Daniel Garland, et al
as 22-16726
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE MILES, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL GARLAND, HCA EOP Escort, JESSE RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer, CRAIG BASER, HCA EOP Escort and others
Peter J. Reed v. C. Muhammed et al
as 2:2022cv05227
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Reed
Defendant:
C. Muhammed, Ramos, III, D. Rouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maurice Miles, Sr., et al v. Daniel Garland, et al
as 20-17194
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG BASER, HCA EOP Escort, DANIEL GARLAND, HCA EOP Escort, HEMNESS, Jailer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE MILES, Sr.
TEITELMAN v. ESF, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02539
Defendant:
ESF, INC., ESF SUMMER CAMPS, INC. and MICHAEL D ROUSE
Plaintiff:
JODI TEITELMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
(PC) Miles v. Garland et al
as 2:2019cv01881
Defendant:
Tyler S. Hanna, D. Rouse, Garrett A. Coffman and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Miles and Maurice Miles, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Joseph Rouse
as 19-5400
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH D. ROUSE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Melvin R. Arrant v. R. Velasquez et al
as 2:2018cv06871
Defendant:
D. Rouse, B. Camack, B Kirker and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Arrant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
