Marvin Lee James v. D. Samuel et al
| Marvin Lee James |
| D. Samuel, J. Steck and M. Thurry |
| 2:2022cv05277 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee #2 . It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $22.16 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (jp). Modified on 9/1/2022 (jp).
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (sh) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Marvin Lee James. (sh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants D. Samuel, J. Steck, M. Thurry pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon., filed by Plaintiff Marvin Lee James. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
