Morris Day v. Jeffrey Sichaleune et al
Morris Day and Rickey Louis Alford |
Durnell, Jeffrey Sichaleune, Big D, Thomas, Amish Mahajan, Security Officer and Sheriff Deputies |
2:2022cv09478 |
December 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis because: The District Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction; the action is frivolous or malicious; the action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured by amendment, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ( MD JS-6, Case Terminated. ) (gk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (sh) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Morris Day. (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Durnell, Amish Mahajan, Security Officer, Sheriff Deputies, Jeffrey Sichaleune, Thomas Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar., filed by Plaintiff Morris Day. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.