Cases 1 - 10 of 151,362
Stockton v. Daniel
as 4:2025cv00237
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Stockton
Defendant:
Thomas Nathan Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus v. Ellison et al
as 1:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus
Defendant:
Corporal Ellison, Deputy Thomas, Deputy Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lujano v. Dart et al
as 1:2025cv02647
Plaintiff:
Adam Lujano
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John Doe and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doggett v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2025cv02652
Plaintiff:
Armstead T. L. Doggett
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2025pq00345
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Thomas Miller and Doris Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Taulman et al
as 3:2025cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jason Bolding Thomas
Defendant:
Jacob R Taulman, Joseph E Morrison, Claire E Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2025cv00133
Plaintiff:
GOD/SYLVESTER THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilberti v. Zuckerberg et al
as 2:2025cv10707
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, George W. Bush, Donna Marie Padar and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
