Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fleming et al v. Malachi Haugen Construction, LLC et al
as 0:2026cv03188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fleming and Melissa Fleming
Defendant:
Malachi Haugen Construction, LLC and Malachi Haugen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kennedy et al v. Gadsden et al
as 1:2026cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kennedy and Thomas Kennedy
Defendant:
Jonas Gadsden and Evans Delivery Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03731
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03735
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stanley v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2026cv00097
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Stanley
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv01371
Plaintiff:
Noah Tc Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2026cv02346
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GALLO
Defendant:
HOT TOPIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Billhime v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
as 2:2026cv07321
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harrison Billhime
Defendant:
Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thomas v. The City of Nampa, et al.
as 1:2026cv00418
Plaintiff:
William B. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Nampa, Nampa Police Department, St. Alphonses Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
