Cases 1 - 10 of 1,153
Cartagenova et al v. ko et al
as 2:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Mari Cartagenova, Stephanie McWilliams and Thomas Sakowych
Defendant:
Jasper ko and MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Cartagenova et al v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Mari Cartagenova, Stephanie McWilliams, Thomas Sakowych and others
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Supranovich v. Julio et al
as 2:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Thomas Supranovich
Defendant:
Juan Julio, Gabriela Najera, James E. Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deangelis v. Anavex Life Sciences Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Denise Deangelis
Defendant:
Christopher Missling, Peter Donhauser, Jiong Ma and others
Melville v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Melville
Defendant:
Warden Henley, Bashor and Roach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevius v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Nevius
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Augborne v. Malone et al
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Brit F. Augborne
Defendant:
Metro Police Officer Connor Malone, City of Las Vegas, Motel 6, LLC, Corp, Entity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Oelker v. Idaho State Bar (ISB) et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
Jeromy Oelker
Respondent:
Idaho State Bar (ISB), Director Diane Minnich and Attorney Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Thomas
as 2:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Brown
Defendant:
Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
