Leonides Enriquez v. City of Long Beach et al
| Leonides Enriquez |
| Long Beach City, DOES 1-10, City of Long Beach, Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4, Does 5-10, inclusive, Lizardo and Mays |
| 2:2023cv06464 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANTS City of Long Beach, Lizardo, Mays, identifying CITY OF LONG BEACH, HECTOR LIZARDO AND LEIGHTON MAYS. (Masero, Nicholas) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 25 . CM connection was lost during docketing sequence and pdf was not attached. Minutes have been redocketed as docket no 26 and are attached to this notice for reference. (lc) |
Filing 26
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On September 21, 2023, Defendants filed their Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint #23 This was Defendants' first appearance in this matter. As of today's date, Defendants have not filed a Central District Local Rule 7.1-1 Notice of Interested Parties. This required document are necessary for the Court to evaluate the potential need for recusal. The Court therefore ORDERS Defendants to file a Notice of Interested Parties within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in the Court striking Defendants' Answer. (lc)
|
|
Filing 25
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On September 21, 2023, Defendants filed their Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint #23 This was Defendants' first appearance in this matter. As of todays date, Defendants have not filed a Central District Local Rule 7.1-1 Notice of Interested Parties. This required document are necessary for the Court to evaluate the potential need for recusal. The Court therefore ORDERS Defendants to file a Notice of Interested Parties within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in the Court striking Defendants' Answer. (lc)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for November 27, 2023 at 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #15 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants City of Long Beach, Lizardo, Mays.(Attorney Nicholas J Masero added to party City of Long Beach(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas J Masero added to party Lizardo(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas J Masero added to party Mays(pty:dft))(Masero, Nicholas) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez, upon Defendant Mays served on 9/1/2023, answer due 9/22/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Zaldana #5886 - Subpoena Control - Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez, upon Defendant Lizardo served on 9/1/2023, answer due 9/22/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Zaldana #5886 - Subpoena Control - Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez, upon Defendant City of Long Beach served on 9/1/2023, answer due 9/22/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jaylin Lara, Clerk-Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 19 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #15 as to defendants City of Long Beach, Lizardo, Mays. (lc) |
| Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #15 filed by plaintiff Leonides Enriquez. (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #16 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The date and signature line must be left blank. 1) FORM Incomplete and was not "FLATTEN" and saved as a proper pdf document. "BLUE TEXT BOXES" remain active. 2) MISSING CASE NUMBER with assigned Judge and Magistrate's initials. 3) City of Long Beach Attorney's Office and City Clerk of Long Beach ARE NOT NAMED DEFENDANTS and should not be named in the "TO:" area which is for Named defendants only. 4) INDICATE ON THE FORM "ON THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ". The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
| Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #15 filed by plaintiff Leonides Enriquez. (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez(Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant City of Long Beach. (lc) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Summons Request #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer Erroneously filled in date of issuance on resubmitted summons, which is otherwise correct. NOTE: Clerk will issue the summons by separate entry THIS TIME ONLY. Therefore NO RESPONSE TO THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED. Please do not enter issue date on summons form in future filings. (lc) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #10 , Summons Request #9 filed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez. (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #9 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. 1)MISSING ASSIGNED JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE INITIALS ON OFFICIAL CASE NO. Case No. is to read as:2:23-cv-06464-ODW (AJRx); The "TO: " has NO named defendants listed... appears to be Only service address.. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez. (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez. (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez, (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez. (Sehat, Cameron) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35818215 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez. (Attorney Cameron Sehat added to party Leonides Enriquez(pty:pla))(Sehat, Cameron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
