Gwendolyn Hall v. Joe Biden et al
Gwendolyn Hall |
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris |
2:2024cv04057 |
May 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Banks and Banking |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (sh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Gwendolyn Hall. (sh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR US MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS filed by Plaintiff Gwendolyn Hall. (sh) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gwendolyn Hall, (sh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Joe Biden, Kamala Harris.Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Gwendolyn Hall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Barack Obama, #3 President Joe Biden, #4 Vice President Kamala Harris) (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.