Correy Mitchell v. Captain Gutierrez et al
| Correy Mitchell |
| The Riverside Inspectors Office, A Vernal, J Adams, John Doe #1, John Does, Gell, Gutierrez, Hagen, K Hall, T Jones, William Lund, McAllister, The County of Riverside, Sexson and Nash |
| 5:2011cv01121 |
| July 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder, In accordance with the Order Dismissing Action for Failure to Pay Filing Fee and Failure to Prosecute 108 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Jean P Rosenbluth. Plaintiff has not complied with § 1915(b)(1) and is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed witho ut prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to timely pay the initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff must file a response to this Order to Show Cause no later than 20 days from the date of this Order. Failure to file a response within the time specified may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. If the initial partial filing fee is received within the 20-day period, no further response to this Order to Show Cause is necessary. (wr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
