Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Gell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv06394
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lynn Gell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv01147
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Evans (Rush)
as 25-3138
Defendant:
SAQUAN EVANS, JARRELL WILLIAMS, DEMETRIUS SULLIVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Villanueva v. Privratsky et al
as 0:2025cv04131
Plaintiff:
Robert Eliazar Villanueva
Defendant:
Tracy Privratsky, Kala Kolkind, Tawnya Gelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villanueva v. Privratsky et al
as 0:2025cv03243
Plaintiff:
Robert Eliazar Villanueva
Defendant:
Tracy Privratsky, Kala Kolkind, Tawnya Gelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gelle v. USA
as 4:2025cv01169
Petitioner:
Andrew E. Gelle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv02264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv02261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kevin Walker Estate et al v Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2025cv00646
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker Estate, Kevin Lewis Walker and Kevin Walker IRR Trust
Defendant:
Chad Bianco, Steven Arthur Sherman, Gregory D Eastwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
