Antquan Durpree Clay v. San Bernardino County et al
| Antquan Durpree Clay |
| G Foxwell, F Harris, Lang and San Bernardino County |
| 5:2015cv02395 |
| November 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H. King |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order why his action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 41-6 and/or for failure to prosecute. Notice to the Court of a current address shall be deemed a sufficient response to this order. If Petitioner does not timely comply with this Court's order to show cause, the Court will recommend that the action be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. (See document for further details.) (sbou)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge George H. King. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation 41 is approved and accepted; (2) Defendants motion to dismiss 22 is denied; and (3) Defendants Harris and Foxwell are ordered to answer the FAC within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. (nbo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
