Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Michaels et al v. Brixton Everett, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv03657
Defendant:
Natalie Oosterhof, Emily Lupton, Monika Ueltschi and others
Plaintiff:
US Metro Jobs, Clarrvia, OPMG Models & Talent Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lange v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv50526
Defendant:
Commissioner Frank J. Bisignano
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth H. Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lang v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv12896
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC, Google LLC, TikTok, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Do v. Do et al
as 2:2026cv03623
Defendant:
Biovie, Inc., Michael Sherman, Sigmund Rogich and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Do
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lang v. Phoenix, City of
as 2:2026cv10050
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lang, Bridgette v. Bisignano, Frank
as 3:2026cv01068
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Marie Lang
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lange v. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
as 5:2026cv05298
Plaintiff:
Shileen Lange
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Padilla v. Do et al
as 3:2026cv00841
Plaintiff:
Arthur Padilla
Defendant:
Cuong Do, Joseph Palumbo, Robert Hariri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lang v. WV Parole Board et al
as 5:2026cv00197
Petitioner:
Christopher Lang
Respondent:
WV Parole Board and Russell Maston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Koonts et al
as 2:2026cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jah'Ree Smith
Defendant:
John Koonts and Abraham Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
