Michael Fiorito v. Dr. Anderson et al
| Michael Fiorito |
| Dr. Anderson, Bishop, Brown, Dr. Bueno, Coleman, Ian Connors, Doe Defendants, Edwards, Warden Entzel, Dr. Gomez, Gomez, Guthrie, Hoang, John and Jane Does, Keller, Dr. Thomas Love, Thomas Love, Dr. Peikar, Poyner, Stewart, United States of America and Weaver |
| 5:2018cv00506 |
| March 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E. Scott |
| John F. Walter |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER ACCEPTING SECOND AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter re Second Amended Report and Recommendation 161 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 96 ) is granted in part and denied in part. **See Order for details** (kh)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter for Report and Recommendation (Final), 35 . (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the claims against Ian Connor and the Doe Defendants located in Washington DC are dismissed without leave to am end; (2) the damages claims against the individual Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed without leave to amend; (3) Plaintiff's Bivens claims against Defendants Dr. Anderson, HSA Weaver, and the Doe Defendants at FCI Gilmer, as well as the FTCA claims against the United States based on these Defendants' behavior, are severed and transferred to the Northern District of West Virginia; and (4) Plaintiff's Bivens claims against Defendants Dr. Thomas Love, Dr. Gomez, Unit Manager Edwards, Ms. Brown and Mr. Stewart, as well as the FTCA claims against the United States based on these Defendants' behavior, are severed and transferred to the Eastern District of Kentucky. 16 . (sbou)
|
|
Filing
16
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Re: Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) 1 . For the reasons explained below, it is recommended that the claims against Defendants at FCI Gilmer and FCI Ashland be severe d from this action and transferred to the appropriate districts in West Virginia and Kentucky. It is also recommended that certain claims and Defendants be dismissed without leave to amend. This Amended R&R addresses Plaintiff's objections to the initial R&R. (jdo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
