Cases 1 - 10 of 17,779
Hightower v. Crews et al
as 5:2025cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Hightower
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Abygail Caudill, Shea Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ardon Visual Communications Corp. v. 125 Development NH Corp. et al
as 1:2025cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ardon Visual Communications Corp.
Defendant:
125 Development NH Corp., Manager Coleman P. McDonough and Jennifer McDonough
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Meyers v. Caughron et al
as 7:2025cv00177
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Samuel Caughron, C. Vilbrant, T. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin Coleman v. Chadwick Dotson
as 25-6178
Petitioner:
IRVIN EMANUEL COLEMAN, a/k/a Lord Divine Allah
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Ross v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2025cv00166
Petitioner:
Steven Andrew Ross
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Desmuke v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2025cv00167
Petitioner:
Casey Desmuke
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2025cv00168
Petitioner:
Shayne Carson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coleman v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2025cv00318
Plaintiff:
Marcus Vernell Coleman
Defendant:
State of Louisiana and LA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Arnold et al v. Aqua Illinois, Inc.
as 1:2025cv02522
Plaintiff:
Rozita Arnold, Patsy Banks, Adrienne Baugh and others
Defendant:
Aqua Illinois, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
