Cases 1 - 10 of 332
Coleman-Morales v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00516
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sydnie Coleman-Morales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Coleman v. Maderitz Concrete Company et al.
as 4:2024cv01544
Defendant:
Captain Burke, Maderitz Concrete Company, Major Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lamar Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Grogan et al.
as 3:2024cv01298
Defendant:
Judge Taresa Ballinger, Raymond A. Grogan, Jr., David Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Frederick Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Graham v. Aiken et al.
as 3:2024cv01131
Defendant:
Charlie Summers, John Doe Tortfeasors, Marion-Hardin Corrections Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03150
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coleman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Addison Coleman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
