Jose Hernandez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Jose Hernandez |
| Does 1 through 25, inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc. |
| 5:2018cv01897 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of Ohio, 2:18-cv-01167 filed 10/2/2018. (iv) |
Filing 15
ORDER LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation MDL NO 286. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as "CTO-4" filed on September 11, 2018, is LIFTED insofar as it relates to this action. The action is transferred to the Southern District of Ohio for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. 1407 being conducted by the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. (twdb)
|
| Filing 14 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-4) from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2846, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of Ohio and assigned to Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Davol Inc. answer now due 10/11/2018; C. R. Bard, Inc. answer now due 10/11/2018, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Davol Inc.; C. R. Bard, Inc..(Buhr, Eric) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:18-cv-05069 SVW(SSx) (rn)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Shashi H. Kewalramani. New Case Number 5:18-cv-1897-JGB(SHKx). (ghap) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc., re Notice of Related Case(s), #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 , Jury Demand #6 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 * Proof Of Service Of Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. And Davol Inc.s Notice Of Removal Of Action Under 28 U.S.C. 1441(B) (Diversity); And Subsequently Filed Documents * served on September 4, 2018. (Buhr, Eric) |
| Filing 6 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc... (Buhr, Eric) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc.. * Defendants C. R. Bard Inc., And Davol Inc.s Notice Of Pendency Of Other Actions Or Proceedings * Related Case(s): 2:18-md-2846-EAS-KAJ (MDL-2846) (S.D. OH.); 2:18-cv-05069; 2:18-cv-05909; 5:18-cv-01375 (Buhr, Eric) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. identifying Davol Inc., wholly owned subsidiary of C. R. Bard, Inc.; C. R. Bard, Inc., wholly owned subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Company; T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. owns 10% or more of Becton, Dickinson and Companys stock as Corporate Parent. (Buhr, Eric) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc., identifying Jose Hernandez; Davol Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of C. R. Bard, Inc.; C. R. Bard, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Company; T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., 10% or more owner of Becton, Dickinson and Companys stock. (Buhr, Eric) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc.. (Buhr, Eric) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc., Does 1 through 25, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Jose Hernandez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/10/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior, case number CIVDS1820875 with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 09/04/2018, receipt number 26C1TSJ9), Receipt No: 0973-22365777- Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Davol Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Part 1 - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A Part 2 - State Court Summons, #3 Exhibit A Part 3 - State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit A Part 4 - State Court Notice of Trial Setting Conference, #5 Exhibit A Part 5 - State Court Certificate of Assignment, #6 Exhibit A Part 6 - State Court Order on Court Fee Waiver for Jose Hernandez, #7 Exhibit B - August 6, 2018 Transfer order MDL 2846 And CTO 1, #8 Exhibit C - Notice to State Court and Adverse Party of Federal Court Removal, #9 Exhibit D - Statement of Damages) (Attorney Eric J Buhr added to party C. R. Bard, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Eric J Buhr added to party Davol Inc.(pty:dft))(Buhr, Eric) Modified on 9/6/2018 (ghap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
