Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,619
Simmons v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00728
Plaintiff: Ronald Simmons
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelly v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2025cv00666
Plaintiff: Kelly Ann Kelly
Defendant: C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goldsberry v. Davol Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2025cv00958
Plaintiff: James Goldsberry
Defendant: Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Macaluso v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv04906
Plaintiff: Robert Macaluso
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Becton, Dickinson and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KELLY v. C. R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2025cv05435
Plaintiff: KELLY ANN KELLY
Defendant: C. R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nocton v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00582
Plaintiff: Thomas Nocton
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Esperias v. C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.
as 25-2701
Plaintiff: ANA ESPERIAS
Defendant: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., an Arizona corporation, DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive and C. R. BARD, INC., a foreign corporation
Baxter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00436
Plaintiff: Tina Marlene Baxter
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scogna et al vs Davol Inc et al
as 2:2025cv00265
Defendant: Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Plaintiff: Benjamin Scogna and Minerva Scogna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harvey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00108
Plaintiff: Vontressa Harvey
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?