Lawrence Drewry v. County of Riverside et al
Lawrence Drewry |
County of Riverside, Alfredo Medina and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
5:2020cv02554 |
December 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants County of Riverside, Alfredo Medina. (et) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Drewry. (Steering, Jerry) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Drewry.. (Steering, Jerry) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Drewry, identifying County of Riverside, Alfredo Medina. (Steering, Jerry) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Drewry. (Steering, Jerry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29465737 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Lawrence Drewry. (Attorney Jerry L Steering added to party Lawrence Drewry(pty:pla))(Steering, Jerry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.