Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Medina v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2023cv02209
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Medina v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MEDINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02397
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MEDINA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Medina v. Victory Marketing Agency, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Medina
Defendant:
Victory Marketing Agency, LLC, WellHealth Management, LLC and Vincent Antonio
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Medina
as 22-11004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alfredo Medina
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00777
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
MEDINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24219
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02332
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence Drewry v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv02554
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Alfredo Medina and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Drewry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36309
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
