Kenyon Derral Brown v. City of Rialto et al
Kenyon Derral Brown and Kenyon Darrell Brown |
City of Rialto, District Attorney San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, Rialto Police Dept, Deputy Public Defender, Police Officer Jason Breen and San Bernardino County Sheriff |
5:2021cv00565 |
March 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
R Gary Klausner |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, Related to: Order Dismissing Action #12 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this First Action is DISMISSED with prejudice and the Second Action is dismissed, with Claims One and Three therein dismissed with prejudice and Claim Two therein dismissed without prejudice. In addition, the operative IFP Applications in the First Action (Dkt. 2, 7) and in the Second Action (Dkt. 2) are DENIED. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 11 Fourth Supplemental Brief in Support of First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Darrell Brown. (mba) |
Filing 10 Third Supplemental Brief in Support of First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Darrell Brown. (mba) |
Filing 9 Second Supplemental Brief in Support of First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Darrell Brown. (mba) |
Filing 8 First Supplemental Brief in Support of First Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Darrell Brown. (mba) |
Filing 7 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Darrell Brown. (hr) |
Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Jason Breen, Deputy Public Defender, San Bernardino County Sheriff; Party District Attorney San Bernardino, Rialto Police Dept, City of Rialto and County of San Bernardino terminated, amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Darrell Brown(hr) |
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge John D re #1 . Early. Having reviewed the allegations in the Complaint, the Court finds that the claims set forth below are subject to dismissal for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Based on that finding, the Court provides Plaintiff with several options regarding how to proceed. Within thirty (30) days of this Order, Plaintiff must choose one of the following options and file the document required by that option:(see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Blank Notice of Dismissal, #3 Blank Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees) (mba) |
Filing 4 MOTION for 2.2 Million Dollar Settlement filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Derral Brown. (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Derral Brown. (car) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants City of Rialto, County of San Bernardino, District Attorney San Bernardino, Rialto Police Dept pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, filed by Plaintiff Kenyon Derral Brown. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.