Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Brown v. San Quentin State Prison Warden et al
as 4:2023cv00973
Petitioner:
Kenyon Darrell Brown
Respondent:
San Quentin State Prison Warden and Captain Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kenyon Darrell Brown v. Warden
as 5:2022cv01389
Petitioner:
Kenyon Darrell Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenyon Brown v. Ron Bloomfield
as 22-70160
Petitioner:
KENYON DARRELL BROWN
Respondent:
RON BLOOMFIELD, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Kenyon Brown v. CDCR
as 22-70065
Petitioner:
KENYON DARRELL BROWN
Respondent:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Kenyon Darrell Brown v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00438
Petitioner:
Kenyon Darrell Brown
Respondent:
State of California, Gov Gavin Newsome and CDCR Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenyon Brown v. Psychiatrist Mental Health
as 22-55213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENYON DARRELL BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
PSYCHIATRIST MENTAL HEALTH, at West Vally Detention Center
Kenyon Brown v. Director, et al
as 22-15265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENYON DARRELL BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR, CDCR :North Kern State Prison, CASE RECORDS, Department :North Kern State Prison and KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden, Warden at North Kern State Prison
Kenyon Darrell Brown v. State of California et al
as 5:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenyan Derrall Brown and Kenyon Darrell Brown
Defendant:
State of California and Kelly Santaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenyon Darrell Brown v. CDCR Director
as 5:2022cv00226
Petitioner:
Kenyon Darrell Brown
Respondent:
CDCR Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenyon Darrell Brown v. CDCR Director
as 5:2022cv00172
Petitioner:
Kenyon Darrell Brown
Respondent:
CDCR Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
