Cynthia Hampton et al v. Walmart Inc.
| Cynthia Hampton, as G.A.L. for C.B. Cynthia Hampton and C. B. |
| WALMART Inc. |
| 5:2022cv01337 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Walmart Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 16 Text Only Entry re PETITION for Appointment of Cynthia Hampton as Guardian ad Litem for C.B. and C.B. #5 . Terminating PETITION for Appointment of Cynthia Hampton as Guardian ad Litem for C.B. and C.B. #5 Pursuant to the Courts directive, the Petition seeking appointment of a Guardian ad Litem is hereby STRICKEN. The Courts Courtroom Deputy contacted counsel via e-mail over two weeks ago about issues (in this case, non-matching names) in the Petition. Counsel has not responded to date. The Petition is therefore stricken without prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (eq) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #14 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s) must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jp) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #11 filed by Plaintiffs C. B.(minor), Cynthia Hampton. (Singleton, Gerald) |
| Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (dr) |
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:22-cv-03864-JLS(GJSx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym and Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes to Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:22-cv-01337-JLS(GJSx). Signed by Judge Josephine L. Staton (ap)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (sh) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Alicia D. O neill. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Mikal C. Watts. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (sh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (sh) |
| Filing 5 PETITION for Appointment of Cynthia Hampton as Guardian ad Litem for C.B. and C.B. filed by Plaintiffs Cynthia Hampton. (Singleton, Gerald) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Cynthia Hampton, identifying Plaintiffs and Defendant. (Singleton, Gerald) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Cynthia Hampton. (Singleton, Gerald) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Cynthia Hampton, Cynthia Hampton, Cynthia Hampton. (Singleton, Gerald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33724178 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Cynthia Hampton. (Attorney Gerald Blaine Singleton added to party Cynthia Hampton(pty:pla), Attorney Gerald Blaine Singleton added to party Cynthia Hampton(pty:pla), Attorney Gerald Blaine Singleton added to party Cynthia Hampton(pty:pla))(Singleton, Gerald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
