Maria Quinones v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Maria Quinones |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 to 10 |
| 5:2023cv00893 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sherilyn Peace Garnett |
| Sheri Pym |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Maria Quinones Maria Quinones. (Ayvazian, Sally) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: On June 22, 2023, Plaintiff filed Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 10). The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for September 20, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. If the parties file a dismissal by September 18, 2023, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance by counsel will be required. All pending dates are vacated.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (McNulty, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace. Pursuant to the Order setting the Scheduling Conference filed at Dkt. No. #8 . The parties were to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report fourteen days before the scheduling conference, to date no such report has been filed. The parties shall file the report by June 26, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/14/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 6/28/2023 at 03:00 PM before Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. (pg)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-00893 SPG (SPx). (ghap) |
| NON CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 10, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Maria Quinones. (FILED IN STATE COURT COURT ON 1/19/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A)(ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, identifying Ford Motor Company. (McNulty, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (McNulty, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVSB2303060 Receipt No: ACACDC-35333406 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Elizabeth V. McNulty ISO Removal, #2 Declaration Samantha M. Geraghty ISO Removal) (Attorney Elizabeth V. McNulty added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(McNulty, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
