Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Maria Quinones v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Maria Quinones
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
QUINONES et al v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 2:2018cv11549
Plaintiff:
MARIA QUINONES and DAVID QUINONES
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2, AIRGAS, INC., JOHN DOES I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sardina et al v. Charles et al
as 1:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marisol Sardina , Columba Rodriguez , Margarita Herrera and others
Defendant:
Long Peak Arches Inc, McDonalds Corporation, Lorena Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OQUENDO CLAUDIO et al v. Santander Financial Services Inc.
as 3:2010cv02185
Plaintiff:
JOSE W OQUENDO CLAUDIO , CARMEN DELGADO RAMIREZ , MARIA QUINONES RIVERA and others
Defendant:
Santander Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Quinones v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv03213
Plaintiff:
Maria Quinones
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Quinones-Ortiz v. Gonzalez
as 3:2009cv01660
Plaintiff:
Maria Quinones-Ortiz
Defendant:
Jose M Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Quinones v. Mulculsulban
as 3:2007cv01565
Plaintiff:
Maria Quinones
Defendant:
Officer Mulculsulban, USA and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
