Riyawna Washington v. Target Corporation et al
| Riyawna Washington |
| Target Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv01133 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, AND CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2024 01:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 11/19/2024 08:15 AM ; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 11/1/2024 at 01:00 PM ( SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 09/27/2024. (tf)
|
| Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the court VACATES the August 18, 2023, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed Defendant Target Corporation's Notice of Removal and is presently unable to conclude it has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 USC 1332(a). In particular, and without limitation, the court finds that the allegations in the Notice of Removal do not demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, withinfourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy does not exceed the jurisdictional threshold. The parties are encouraged to submit evidence. and/or judicially noticeable facts in response to the courts Order. Responses shall be limited to ten (10) pages in length. The parties should consider this Order to be a two pronged inquiry into the facial and factual sufficiency of Defendant's demonstration of jurisdiction. As Defendant is the party asserting federal jurisdiction, Defendant's failure torespond timely and adequately to this Order shall result in remand of the actionwithout further notice. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT of Rule 26(f) filed by Plaintiff Riyawna Washington. (Zambrano, Ronald) |
| Filing 10 Notice Of Compliance with 28 USC Sec. 1446(D) filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Soto, Marjorie) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 8/18/2023 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 23-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:23-cv-01133 FLA (SPx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Target Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Riyawna Washington. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/10/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E)(ghap) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Target Corporation, identifying Riyawna Washington (Plaintiff). (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Target Corporation (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County, case number CIVSB2310067 Receipt No: BCACDC-35494542 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F to Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration Adam Klarfeld In Support of Removal, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Marjorie Clara Soto added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft))(Soto, Marjorie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
