Daniel Marfil v. Target Corporation et al
| Daniel Marfil |
| Target Corporation and Does 1-25, inclusive |
| 5:2023cv02300 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| A Joel Richlin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-6 days, filed by Defendant Target Corporation.. (Soto, Marjorie) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/12/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 1/22/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES upon filing of the complaint by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Shasha H. Kewalramani to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:23-cv-02300 RGK(AJRx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE filed by Plaintiff Daniel Marfil (Gunther, Brett) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (dc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Target Corporation. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Marfil. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/3/2023 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Target Corporation, identifying Target Corporation. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Target Corporation identifying Target Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of San Bernardino, case number CIVSB2324616 Receipt No: ACACDC-36374452 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adam Klarfeld, #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Maria C. Rodriguez added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft))(Rodriguez, Maria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
