Targus International LLC v. Incipio Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Targus International LLC
Defendant: Incipio Technologies, Inc., Incase Designs Corp., Incipio LLC and Does 1-10
Case Number: 8:2020cv00425
Filed: March 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING #20 by Judge James V. Selna. Defendants shall file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before June 1, 2020. (es)
April 21, 2020 Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 6/1/2020 filed by Defendants Incipio Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tache, J)
March 19, 2020 Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Incipio Technologies, Inc. answer now due 4/30/2020; Incase Designs Corp. answer now due 4/30/2020; Incipio LLC answer now due 4/30/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Incipio Technologies, Inc..(Attorney J Rick Tache added to party Incipio Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Tache, J)
March 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for June 8, 2020 at 10:00 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by June 1, 2020. (mku)
March 13, 2020 Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC, upon Defendant Incase Designs Corp. served on 3/5/2020, answer due 3/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Peter Cayetano, Process Specialist with CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Kim, Jenny)
March 13, 2020 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC, upon Defendant Incipio LLC served on 3/5/2020, answer due 3/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Peter Cayetano, Process Specialist with CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Kim, Jenny)
March 13, 2020 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC, upon Defendant Incipio Technologies, Inc. served on 3/10/2020, answer due 3/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bahare Mehrenfar - Human Resources Director at Andy Fathollahi's Office - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Kim, Jenny)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:14-cv-01455-JVS (RNBx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for DISCOVERY. The case number will now read as follows: 8:20-cv-00425-JVS (JPRx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (eva)
March 4, 2020 Filing 13 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
March 3, 2020 Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Incipio Technologies, Inc. (car)
March 3, 2020 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Incipio LLC. (car)
March 3, 2020 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Incase Designs Corp. (car)
March 3, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
March 3, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car)
March 2, 2020 Filing 7 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Targus International LLC. (Dilger, Nathaniel)
March 2, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC. Related Case(s): 8:15cv1407; 8:15cv1230; 8:15cv1232; 8:14cv1851; 8:14cv1518; 8:14cv1455; 8:19cv932; and, 8:19cv1044 (Dilger, Nathaniel)
March 2, 2020 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC identifying Targus International LLC as Corporate Parent. (Dilger, Nathaniel)
March 2, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC, identifying Plaintiff Targus International LLC; Defendants: Incipio Technologies, Inc.; Incipio LLC; and, Incase Designs Corp.. (Dilger, Nathaniel)
March 2, 2020 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Dilger, Nathaniel)
March 2, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC. (Dilger, Nathaniel)
March 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25577218 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Targus International LLC. (Attorney Nathaniel L Dilger added to party Targus International LLC(pty:pla))(Dilger, Nathaniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Targus International LLC v. Incipio Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Targus International LLC
Represented By: Nathaniel L Dilger
Represented By: Jenny S Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Incipio Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: J Rick Tache
Represented By: Roger L Scott
Represented By: Christina Le Trinh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Incase Designs Corp.
Represented By: J Rick Tache
Represented By: Roger L Scott
Represented By: Christina Le Trinh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Incipio LLC
Represented By: J Rick Tache
Represented By: Roger L Scott
Represented By: Christina Le Trinh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?