Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Shenzhen Jame Technology Corp., Ltd. v. Vinci Brands LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00372
Counter Defendant:
Shenzhen Jame Technology Corp., Ltd.
Counter Claimant:
Vinci Brands LLC
Defendant:
Incipio Technologies, Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Targus International LLC v. Incipio Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00425
Plaintiff:
Targus International LLC
Defendant:
Incipio Technologies, Inc., Incase Designs Corp., Incipio LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plastoform Industries, Ltd. v. Incipio Technologies, Inc., et al
as 8:2018cv00947
Defendant:
Does and Incipio Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Plastoform Industries, Ltd.
Walloon Lake Distribution, LLC et al v. Incipio Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2016cv12350
Plaintiff:
Walloon Lake Distribution, LLC and CCWU, LLC, f/k/a ClamCase, LLC
Defendant:
Incipio Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinetic Trac, LLC v. Incipio Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01849
Plaintiff:
Kinetic Trac, LLC
Defendant:
Incipio Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Vican Inc v. Incipio Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02720
Plaintiff:
Vican Inc doing business as The Vican Group
Defendant:
Incipio Technologies Inc, Braven LC and Warren Osborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Incipio Technologies, Inc. v. Aplars, LLC
as 8:2015cv00277
Defendant:
Aplars, LLC and DOES
Plaintiff:
Incipio Technologies, Inc.
TECHSHELL INC v. INCIPIO TECHNOLOGIES INC
as 3:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
TECHSHELL INC
Defendant:
INCIPIO TECHNOLOGIES INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
ZIEMBA v. INCIPIO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2013cv05590
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. ZIEMBA
Defendant:
INCIPIO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
