Andrew Perrong v. Auto Armor Specialist LLC
Plaintiff: Andrew Perrong
Defendant: Auto Armor Specialist LLC
Case Number: 8:2021cv01467
Filed: September 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #20 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
March 14, 2022 Filing 20 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Kaufman, Rachel)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting Plaintiff's #18 MOTION for Leave to Conduct Discovery. The Court will grant Plaintiff 90 days to perform this discovery, until 4/11/22. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
January 3, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for to Open Discovery filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong. Motion set for hearing on 1/31/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Kaufman, Rachel)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney. On 12/29/2021, the clerk entered default #16 as to the defendant. Plaintiff is hereby directed to file a motion for default judgment within one week of this order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 29, 2021 Filing 16 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Auto Armor Specialist LLC (twdb)
December 29, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Auto Armor Specialist LLC #14 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: The proof of service summons and complaint does not show how service was made. FRCP or CCP Special Service Requirement is missing. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (twdb)
December 28, 2021 Filing 14 APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Auto Armor Specialist LLC filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Rachel Kaufman) (Kaufman, Rachel)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/28/2021. (twdb)
October 18, 2021 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong. upon Auto Armor Specialist LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 10/18/2021, answer due 12/17/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Jeffrey H. Kass. (Kaufman, Rachel)
October 13, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrongto Order to Show Cause #10 (Kaufman, Rachel)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/13/2021. (twdb)
September 14, 2021 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong, upon Defendant Auto Armor Specialist LLC served on 9/14/2021, answer due 10/5/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Kaufman, Rachel)
September 9, 2021 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Auto Armor Specialist LLC. (esa)
September 9, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa)
September 9, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
September 9, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa)
September 8, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong, (Kaufman, Rachel)
September 8, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong. (Kaufman, Rachel)
September 8, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong. (Kaufman, Rachel)
September 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31943219 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Andrew Perrong. (Attorney Rachel Kaufman added to party Andrew Perrong(pty:pla))(Kaufman, Rachel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrew Perrong v. Auto Armor Specialist LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Perrong
Represented By: Rachel Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto Armor Specialist LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?