Cases 1 - 10 of 67
PERRONG v. CHIMA, L.L.C.
as 2:2022cv04654
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRONG
Defendant:
CHIMA, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perrong v. Timeshare Help Source, LLC
as 4:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Andrew Perrong
Defendant:
Timeshare Help Source, LLC, Dan Human and Eduardo Balderas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PERRONG v. SUNWISE ENERGY LLC
as 2:2022cv02824
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRONG
Defendant:
SUNWISE ENERGY LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perrong v. Nordic Energy Services LLC
as 1:2022cv03728
Plaintiff:
Andrew Perrong
Defendant:
Nordic Energy Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PERRONG v. SOUTH BAY ENERGY CORP.
as 2:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRONG
Defendant:
SOUTH BAY ENERGY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perrong v. Constellation Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
Andrew Perrong
Defendant:
Constellation Energy Corporation and Alliance Shareholder Communications LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 22
PERRONG v. TIMESHARE HELP SOURCE, LLC
as 2:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRONG
Defendant:
TIMESHARE HELP SOURCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PERRONG v. MOUNTINEER MARKETING LLC
as 2:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PERRONG
Defendant:
MOUNTINEER MARKETING LLC doing business as VINTAGE SUBSCRIPTION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perrong v. Venture Solar Capital, LLC
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Andrew Perrong
Defendant:
Venture Solar Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Perrong v. PERS Group LLC
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Andrew Perrong
Defendant:
PERS Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
