Najieh Sobhi et al v. Antony J. Blinken et al
Najieh Sobhi, Nooshin Maloumi, Arash Khosravi, T.A. and Ava Khosravi |
Antony J. Blinken and Rena Bitter |
8:2023cv02390 |
December 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendants Antony J. Blinken, Rena Bitter.(Do, Bichngoc) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff T.A., Najieh Sobhi, Arash Khosravi, Nooshin Maloumi, Ava Khosravi, upon Defendant Rena Bitter served on 12/27/2023, answer due 2/26/2024; Antony J. Blinken served on 12/27/2023, answer due 2/26/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bichngoc T. Do on behalf of Defendants Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken (Attorney Bichngoc T. Do added to party Rena Bitter(pty:dft), Attorney Bichngoc T. Do added to party Antony J. Blinken(pty:dft))(Do, Bichngoc) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE CARTER. (ev) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 17-1. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken. (lh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs-Petitioners Arash Khosravi, Ava Khosravi, Nooshin Maloumi, Najieh Sobhi, T.A., (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiffs-Petitioners Arash Khosravi, Ava Khosravi, Nooshin Maloumi, Najieh Sobhi, T.A.. (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioners Arash Khosravi, Ava Khosravi, Nooshin Maloumi, Najieh Sobhi, T.A.. (Ati, Ines) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Receipt No: ACACDC-36592248 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs-Petitioners T.A., Najieh Sobhi, Arash Khosravi, Nooshin Maloumi, Ava Khosravi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney Ines Ati added to party Arash Khosravi(pty:pet), Attorney Ines Ati added to party Ava Khosravi(pty:pet), Attorney Ines Ati added to party Nooshin Maloumi(pty:pet), Attorney Ines Ati added to party Najieh Sobhi(pty:pet), Attorney Ines Ati added to party T.A.(pty:pet))(Ati, Ines) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.