Cases 1 - 10 of 100
County of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2026cv12604
Plaintiff:
John J.B. Doe, John J.F. Doe, John B.G. Doe and others
Petitioner:
County of San Bernardino and Jane M.L. Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jane Doe PNA (T.A.) v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv11195
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (T.A.)
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA, LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kitchen v. Waters et al
as 3:2026cv00980
Plaintiff:
Walter Christian Kitchen
Defendant:
T.A. Waters and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hardman et al v. City of Galveston et al
as 3:2026cv00180
Plaintiff:
Shirley Hardman, Riclando Hardman, Willliam Washington and others
Defendant:
City of Galveston, Texas, Lt. Joel Caldwell, Officer T. Hennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04637
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
