Giles v. Soto et al
| Richard Jeremiah Giles, III |
| Soto, - Reynoso, - Goss, Popper, - Palmer, Madina, Williams, Lazano, Reynaga and Bingham |
| 1:2007cv00197 |
| February 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 30 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson on 9/21/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER, signed by District Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson on 4/7/11. Motions 36 , 38 , 41 DENIED; Plaintiff's shall respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 30] within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order.(Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER, signed by District Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson on 8/30/2010. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDERED to Respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson on 06/1/2010.( Response due by 7/8/2010) (Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER, signed by District Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson on 11/20/2009. (Defendants shall depose Plaintiff, at Defendant's Expense on or before Deadline: 1/30/2010; Witness List on 02/26/2010; Discovery due by 3/31/2010; Dispositive Motions due by 4/30/2010; Status of Settlement by 01/04/2010) (Martin, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
