Thomas v. Perez, et al.
| Rayshon Thomas |
| - Perez, - Hernandez, Garcia, Renee Martinez, - Duarte, Jerry King, Martin and K. Ruiz |
| 1:2007cv01185 |
| August 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Madera |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Maryland Unassigned |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Reconsideration 64 & 65 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/6/12. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
55
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Denial of 50 51 Motions; and Dismissal of 9 Action for Failure to Obey a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/09/2010. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 11/4/2010. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 45 , 46 , 47 , Motions for Extension of Time IN PART; Third Amended Complaint Due within 30 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/24/2010. Third Amended Complaint Due by 9/27/2010. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
38
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Case for Plaintiff's Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/28/09: Recommending that this action be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute as to 9 ; Objections to F&R due by 11/2/2009, Reply due ten days after service of the objections. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
