Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MARTIN v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv02001
Plaintiff:
JASON MARTIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Naja v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv11276
Plaintiff:
Martin Naja
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Barwick v. Eklund et al
as 3:2026cv00737
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Barwick
Defendant:
Ben Eklund, Kelly Martin and Eddie Cathey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPARKS JR. v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv07112
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SPARKS JR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05362
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martin v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04451
Plaintiff:
Darryl Martin
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Wilson v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2026cv07456
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Rene Alvarez, K. Ttienken, A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv02625
Plaintiff:
Martin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Malone (PS) v. Regalado et al
as 1:2026cv04434
Plaintiff:
Carlos Clyde Malone
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, George Brown, Martin Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pr - Fed. Question: Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
