Braley v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Thomas D. Braley
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Suzan Hubbard, Schwarzenegger, Diaz, Peterson, A.K. Miller, F. Vasquez, G Zinani, Buenafe and Lackovic
Case Number: 1:2008cv00758
Filed: June 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: William M. Wunderlich
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER, signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 8/17/2009. It is ORDERED Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Court Ordered "Nunc Pro Tunc Amendment." (Doc. 37 ) (Scrivner, E)
August 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 32 Motion for Certificate of Appealability signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 8/3/2009. It is further certified that Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith and he is not entitled to in forma pauperis status on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (Figueroa, O)
February 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 2/12/2009. The Court ORDERS: (1) Plaintiffs Motion to Amend his Complaint 12 is GRANTED- Amended Complaint due by 3/17/2009;(2) Plaintiffs remaining motions 4 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 13 are DE NIED without prejudice; (3) Plaintiff must file a first amended complaint that substantially complies with the Instructions for submitting a prisoner complaint on the court-approved form. If Plaintiff fails to file a first amended complaint wi thin 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice; (4) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. (Arellano, S.)
January 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER advising the parties that the Court is conducting statutory screening. The matter will proceed following the issuance of the statutory screening order signed by District Judge Mary H. Murguia on 01/28/2009. (Flores, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Braley v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas D. Braley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suzan Hubbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schwarzenegger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.K. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: F. Vasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G Zinani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buenafe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lackovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?