Cases 1 - 10 of 26
(PC) Braley v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
R. Hicks, Lt. D. Crane, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braley v. Pro Se Paralegal, USDC
as 1:2018cv04920
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Pro se Paralegal, USDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braley v. Pro Se Paralegal, USDC
as 4:2018cv04920
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Pro se Paralegal, USDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braley v. Calipatria State Prison et al
as 3:2015cv00975
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Braley
Respondent:
Calipatria State Prison and W. L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braley v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 4:2014cv04511
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Braley
Respondent:
High Desert State Prison and Fredric Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Braley v. M. Markmann, et al
as 14-15946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
M. MARKMANN, Correctional Officer and L. A. MILLER, Correctional Officer
Thomas Braley v. Wasco State Prison, et al
as 12-16991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WASCO STATE PRISON, C. COOPER, Associate Warden, M. HUNTER, Associate Warden and others
Thomas Braley v. Wasco State Prison, et al
as 11-16728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. BRALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WASCO STATE PRISON, C. COOPER, Associate Warden, M. HUNTER, Associate Warden and others
Braley v. Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, et al.
as 1:2011cv00522
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, C.D.C.R., CSATF/SP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braley v. Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, C.D.C.R., CSATF/SP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
