Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC) Braley v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
R. Hicks, Lt. D. Crane, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braley v. Pro Se Paralegal, USDC
as 1:2018cv04920
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Pro se Paralegal, USDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braley v. Pro Se Paralegal, USDC
as 4:2018cv04920
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Pro se Paralegal, USDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braley v. Calipatria State Prison et al
as 3:2015cv00975
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Braley
Respondent:
Calipatria State Prison and W. L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braley v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 4:2014cv04511
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Braley
Respondent:
High Desert State Prison and Fredric Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braley v. Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, et al.
as 1:2011cv00522
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, C.D.C.R., CSATF/SP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braley v. CDCR et al
as 1:2010cv02338
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
CDCR, Kern Valley State Prison, K. Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braley v. CDCR et al
as 5:2010cv04244
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
CDCR, Kern Valley State Prison, K. Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braley v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Suzan Hubbard, Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Braley v. Wasco State Prison, et al
as 1:2007cv01423
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison, C. Cooper, M Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
