Phillip W. Dunn v. Cate et al
| Phillip W. Dunn |
| Matthew Cate, Enenmoh, Giedlen, Hayes, West, Greenman, Tang, Renolds, Lemay, Stohl, White, Booker, Ropani, Burgatt, Green, McCant, Garvin and Ducudrea |
| 1:2008cv00873 |
| June 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Kings |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER Granting 59 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 08/30/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Second 64 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 08/19/2010. Response to Motion for Summary Judgment due by 08/24/2010.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/10/2010 denying 62 Ex Parte Motion to Withdraw Case With Leave to Amend the Complaint. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/6/2010 requiring Plaintiff to file a response to 59 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Enenmoh, Matthew Cate, Greenman. (Filing Deadline: 8/24/2010). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER denying 56 Motion to Compel signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 7/28/2010. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 5/27/10: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 51 is DENIED. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 4/16/2010. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration (doc. 41 ) is denied, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (doc. 40 ) is denied, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction (doc. 42 ), and Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (doc. 38 ) is denied. (Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 46 Defendants' Motion for Continuance of Summary Judgment Proceedings, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 4/12/2010. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER DENYING 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 2/22/2010. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 2/2/2010. Show Cause Response due by 2/19/2010 from Plaintiff. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 1/12/10: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 19 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All Claims are DISMISSED except Plaintiff's claim concerning the initial deprivation of his assistive devices and Plaintiff's claim that he was not allowed to see the doctor or obtain therapy after having back surgery. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Directing Defendants to Provide an Additional Briefing signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 10/22/2009. ( Defendants' Briefing Deadline: 11/20/2009)(Figueroa, O) .
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendants Motion forSummary Judgment, together with a separate Statement of Facts and supporting affidavits or other appropriate exhibits, no later than September 14, 2009.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file a reply within 15 days afterservice of Plaintiffs response, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/12/2009. (Case Management Deadline: 9/15/2009)(Martin, S)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING 17 Motion for Appointment of Counsel signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 8/12/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER, signed by District Judge Neil V. Wake on 4/6/09: Count III is dismissed without prejudice; Defendants Cate, Greenman, Enenmoh and Fisher must answer Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint 10 ; The Clerk of Court must send Plai ntiff a service packet; Plaintiff must return to the Clerk of Court a completed Notice of Submission of Documents with the required documents within 30 days; If Plaintiff fails to return the Notice of Submission of Documents and the require d documents within 30 days of the date of filing of this Order, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Return Service Documents ddl:5/11/2009)(Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
