Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Nesse et al v. Henley Group, LLC, The
as 0:2026cv04739
Defendant:
Henley Group, LLC, The
Plaintiff:
Todd Hayes, Thomas Lutz and John Nesse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Alonzo Graham v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 26-3280
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Hayes, in their official and individual capacities, R. Erdman, in their official and individual capacities, Lt. Bradly Steele, in their official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Jerome Graham
Martin v. Stranger Perpetrators 100+ et al
as 1:2026cv02569
Defendant:
Phillip Queroz, Co-workers, Kris Thaesler and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
11 Bridge Street, LLC v. Shaka et al
as 1:2026cv07127
Plaintiff:
Robert Plumb, Jeanne Kane, Edward Haye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
11 Bridge Street, LLC v. Shaka et al
as 2:2026cv07127
Defendant:
Robert Plumb, Jeanne Kane, Edward Haye and others
Plaintiff:
11 Bridge Street, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(SS) Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv03735
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Genea Monique Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bryant v. Runyon et al
as 2:2026cv00703
Defendant:
Sgt. Hayes, Cpl. Dustin McCoy and Cpl Cassady Runyon
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Summey
as 2:2026cv05429
Defendant:
Hayes Summey
Plaintiff:
Aaron Leon Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gye-Jacquot v. King et al
as 6:2026cv00141
Defendant:
Ryan P. Hayes and Britten Renee King
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gye-Jacquot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 21
Hill v. Grimes et al
as 1:2026cv03111
Defendant:
Jeffrey Getting, Pamala Lightvoet, Unknown Norg and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Marquiss Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.