McElroy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Marvin McElroy |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, William Gausewitz, Avenal State Prison, James D. Hartley, D. Arline, J. Boston, G. Simon, T. Deegan, D. Jackson, M. Neri, Harris and Rocha |
1:2008cv00914 |
June 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Kings |
Gary S. Austin |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER, signed by District Judge David G. Campbell on 4/6/2010. It is ORDERED: Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt.# 25 ) is granted. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. The Court has also reviewed Defendants' response (Dk t. # 29 ) to the Court's order to show cause (Dkt. #[26), and concludes that sanctions against Defendants are not warranted in light of the fact that they were not served with the injunction motion or the Court's order requiring a response. CASE CLOSED. (Scrivner, E) |
Filing 26 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE; ORDER DENYING 22 Motion for TRO; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 24 Motion, signed by District Judge David G. Campbell on 3/9/2010. Defendants' Show Cause Response due by 3/26/2010. (Sondheim, M) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by District Judge David G. Campbell on 1/13/2010. IT IS ORDERED Directing Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's 22 Motion on or Before January 29, 2010. Filing Deadline: 1/29/2010. (Bradley, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.