Cases 1 - 10 of 1,507
Rocha v. Bailey et al
as 4:2024cv06206
Defendant:
Tara Bailey, Jewel Bailey and Jimmie Jones-Newton
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rocha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rocha v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Grecia M. Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 oc Notice of Removal - Other Contract
Frank Rocha et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 2:2024cv07054
Plaintiff:
Frank Rocha and Al Otro Lado, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
(PC) Garden v. CDCR et al
as 1:2024cv00933
Defendant:
D. Martinez, G. Geels, J. Guzman Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owen Garden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rocha v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv04774
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rocha
Defendant:
Jimmie Jones-Newton, Jewel Bailey and Tara K Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC)Marion II v. Oregel et al
as 1:2024cv00872
Defendant:
Edgar Oregel, David Oberst, S. Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Bently Marion II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv01315
Respondent:
Patrick Lechleitner, Christopher LaRose, Merrick Garland and others
Petitioner:
Hau Cheong Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
