Lee v. Wilkinson, et al
| Cornelius V Lee |
| L Wilkinson, G Chavez, Gonzales, John Doe, R Casttellanoz, F Shelby, Mathew Cate and James Yates |
| 1:2009cv00722 |
| April 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| William M. Wunderlich |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Action, With Prejudice, For Failure to Prosecute; Objections Due Within Ten Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/6/11: 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Cornelius V. Lee, 31 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by G. Chavez, R. Casttellanoz, F. Shelby, L. Wilkinson, Gonzales, referred to Judge Ishii. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Denying Motions (Docs. 28 , 29 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/27/2010. It is ORDERED that: Plaintiff's May 6, 2010, motion requesting that Title 15 be "accepted into evidence" is DENIED; and Plaintiff's August 12, 2010, motion requesting an extension of time is DENIED. (Scrivner, E)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Dismissing Claims signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 02/17/2010. Matthew Cate and James Yates terminated from action. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
