Cases 1 - 10 of 508
Yates et al v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana L L C et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Defendant:
sheryl king and Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana L L C
Plaintiff:
james yates and Sharon Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
YATES v. HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
JAMES YATES
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY HOSPITAL doing business as BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE BLOOMINGTON CARE CENTER, BRICKYARD HEALTHCARE, INC. and GGNSC BLOOMINGTON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yates v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv02696
Petitioner:
James Yates
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Drew v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Drew
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., James Yates, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Derreck Ryan Gray
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Davis Correctional Facility, James Yate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 23-7007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
Ezell v. Hininger, et al
as 22-7024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON HININGER, CEO of Core Civic, JAMES YATES, Warden, Davis Correctional Facility, DEPUTY WARDEN GENTRY and others
James Yates, et al v. Kim Davis
as 22-5261
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES YATES and WILL SMITH
Defendant / Appellant:
KIM DAVIS, Individually
Yates v. Amason
as 5:2021cv01194
Plaintiff:
Yates Travis James and Travis James Yates
Defendant:
Detective Chris Amason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonetti v. Gay et al
as 1:2021cv01202
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Defendant:
John Gay, Alisha Lucero, Leon Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
