Royal v. Knight et al
| Marlin Lattereal Royal |
| S. Knight, K. Turner, Gardner, T. Akin, A. Lyons, J. Cronjager, A. F. Hernandez, Ken Clark and B. Murberger |
| 1:2009cv01407 |
| August 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 61 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/7/14. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 40 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/19/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER DISCHARGING 47 Order to Show Cause Why Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Should Not be Granted for Plaintiff's Failure to File Opposition, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/19/13. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment should not be Granted for Plaintiff's Failure to File Opposition; Twenty-One Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/25/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To File A Response To Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Within Thirty Days (ECF No. 40 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/5/2012. (Responses due by 1/9/2013)(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Modifying 42 Motion Discovery and Scheduling Order ; ORDERED that should Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be Denied in whole or in part, the discovery deadline shall be extended and Defenants are granted sixty days from the date of the order deciding the motion in which to depose Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/16/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/3/2012 granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing certain claims and defendants for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Defendants' Gardner and K. Turner dismissed from case. Defendants' responsive pleading due by 5/4/2012. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
33
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Granting in Part and Denying in Part 23 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/27/12. Referred to Judge O'Neill. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 23 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/27/12. Gardner and K. Turner terminated. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Directing Defendants to Provide Documents to the Court, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/10/12. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Directing Defendants to Consent to or Decline United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction within Ten Days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 02/08/2012. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Dismissing Certain Clailms for Failure to State a Cognizable Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/6/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING Motion 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/30/10: Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
