Cases 1 - 10 of 30
(PC) Douglas v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Roger Douglas
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J. Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mathis v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Kwamaii Mathis
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Justin Marquiz Jackson
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Marshall v. Shirley et al
as 1:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Marshall Rayshawn and Rayshaun Marshall
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, Scott Degough and J. Cronjager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Artel Brown
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chaves v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Danny Chaves
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miller v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Charles Miller
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McElwee v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Robert McElwee
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morales v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Morales
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lee v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shaun Lee
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
