Alvaro Quezada v. Hedgpeth et al
| Alvaro Quezada |
| A. Hedgpeth, K. Harrington and B. Gricewich |
| 1:2009cv02040 |
| November 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 63 Defendant Gricewich's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and Plaintiff's Retaliation Claim Against Defendant Gricewich be DISMISSED Without Prejudice Based on Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies re 12 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/15/2014. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER GRANTING 74 Defendant's Motion to Modify the Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/18/2014. Discovery and dispositive motion deadlines are VACATED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 79 Request to Convert Defendants Rule 12 (B) Motion into a Motion for Summary Judgment Under Rule 56; Compliance with LR 260 Required, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/14/14. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Objections 70 to Motion to Stay Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/28/2014. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Granting Defendant's 68 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/21/14. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion of Abeyance to Suspend the Scheduling Order 61 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/18/13. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Directing Defendant Gricewich to File Responsive Pleading, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/20/13. 20-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Defendant's Motion To Dismiss (ECF Nos. 35 , 51 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/13/2013. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
51
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/18/2013 recommending that 35 MOTION to DISMISS be DENIED. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 8/5/2013. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants, and Referring Matter back to Magistrate Judge to Initiate Service of Process signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/25/2012. K. Harrington and A. Hedgpeth terminated from action. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 24 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/12/12. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Adopting 19 Findings and Recommendations Recommending Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/15/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion For Injunctive Relief, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/8/2011, referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Certain Claims 12 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/14/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
